Councilors float 1-year stay for Elmhurst

09mar11_fincomm.jpg
Town Councilors Jeff Plumb and Keith Hamilton look over financial data with Supt. Susan Lusi.

Everybody at the Finance Committee meeting tonight seemed to want to keep the Elmhurst School open for at least another year, but the devil is in the details, some of which are beyond control of the town. Town Council members Keith Hamilton and Jeff Plumb joined more than 40 people in the PHS Library to hear presentations to the school Finance Subcommittee about costs of technology, co-curriculars, and, of course, Elmhurst.

There was one illuminating exchange toward the end of the meeting, where Councilor Plumb explicitly proposed keeping the school open for one more year.

"Why don't you make an agreement with parents," said Plumb, arguing that the decision was too difficult to make by May, and that with the budget projected to be even grimmer next year, it might make more sense then. "Why not take the savings next year."

"If we're $300K short," replied School Committee Chair Dick Carpender, referring to the projected shortfall, "Will you fund us?"

"Will you go to 20% co-pays?" Plumb responded. Carpender declined to comment, citing ongoing negotiations, but it was clear from the exchange that at least some members of the Council seem to be entertaining the possibility of compromise, rather than the prior position of a 5% cut across the board. "We will go to cap, we will go to 4.75%," said Plumb, "And use that money to the best of our ability."

The level of passion and concern from all the parents in the room could not have escaped anyone on the committee or the councilors, and parent Tim Banks probably put into words what many were thinking. "What I expect from the people I voted for," he said, "Is a thoughtful approach, and what's in the best interest of all the folks in town. Young people are not where to start balancing the budget. It's time for the grown ups to step up."

Both of the councilors seemed to get that. "The town does not want to put saving money on the back of the teachers," said Hamilton. "It's everybody from the town administrator on down. We're not just looking at teachers. Every contract is being looked at."

There was a robust discussion of the issues with closing Elmhurst — the timetable for implementing such a radical change, the lack of information about administrative and transportation costs, disposition of the property, and the specter of an influx of students from the Navy BRAC or private schools. The Elmhurst parents had brought a presentation, and I'll either post or link to it when they make it available.

Compared to earlier meetings, there was much less discussion of property values and other divisive issues, but one Elmhurst parent just couldn't let go of the notion that their school is better. "Elmhurst is the jewel," she said, and cited as a given that test scores were higher there. Why not close one of the weaker schools, she asked.

"All three of our schools are high performing," Carpender replied. "I take exception to that. All three have outstanding parent groups, staff, and students."


09mar11_necap.jpg
Click image to embiggen.

To echo Carpender's point, I shared the following chart, which I started researching after comments at the last meeting regarding Elmhurst's superior test scores. I looked up NECAP data for all three elementary schools for the most recent cohort, current 5th graders. And while it is true that Elmhurst students begin with a higher percentage scoring proficient, what I find striking about the chart is the slope of the lines for the other two schools. It is pretty clear to me that the quality of the teaching and learning is every bit as good at Melville and Hathaway. Let's accept that all our teachers are qualified and all our students have learning potential, and stop this divisive rhetoric about "better."

While Elmhurst was the main attraction this evening, the undercard was equally significant. Director of IT Rose Muller presented to the committee on the need for level funding in technology. She explained that they had been able to reduce software licensing costs by using virtualization (in which the operating system and software sits on a central server and is accessed through less-expensive terminals) but that there were ongoing hardware replacement costs that required the continuation of the technology warrant from the Town.

There was back and forth about the actual cost of the technology warrant, and acknowledgment that the $350K in borrowing actually ends up costing the town $400K. And while there is probably agreement that it would be preferable to build this into the operating budget, the question of how to get there remained unanswered.

The numbers on extracurriculars were presented in detail. Bottom line is that stipends for club and activity advisors run $45K at PHS and about $18K at the Middle School. These are not something that anyone wanted to cut, indeed, Finance Chair Buddemeyer repeated what has become a mantra at these meetings, that because of the possibility of budget shortfall, "These are things we are just considering [...] because we have to."

PHS Principal Bob Littlefield spoke eloquently about the importance of extracurriculars. "This is the other side of life in any public high school," he said. "Think back to when you were in high school and what got you up in the morning, what built your relationships with the adults in the building. This is what makes our high school a vital, thriving place."

And, Lusi noted, many of the extracurriculars are supported by PTOs and boosters. "The [district] budget for band transportation is now smaller than it was 5 years ago, and the Boosters have raised an enormous amount of money."

Finance Director Chris Tague presented the numbers on Portsmouth's co-curricular subjects. With 29.7 total Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) involved, the outlay for all the programs comes to "$3M on a $35M budget." Music (at $832K) and art (at $513K) are the largest chunks, but Lusi warned that many of the programs are mandated by the state.

"They require programs," she said, "But don't necessarily require everything that we have." Some programs have specific minutes-per-week mandated by the state, and some are part of Portsmouth's defined Basic Education Program. "If we have the misfortune to be asked to make reductions in this area, [...] we could potentially, not desirably, save something."

With much more work to do, and a shrinking supply of days between now and March 25 when the budget needs to be submitted to the Town Council, the committee is clearly looking into every possible option.

Next meetings will be Monday and Tuesday at 5:30 in Town Hall.

Comments

As a participant of last night's meeting, and a core member of the parents' group at Elmhurst which is arduously attempting to keep Elmhurst open until a long term solution has been voted upon, I feel strongly that our position regarding the three elementary schools must be stated in clear terms. We are concerned with the impact upon ALL K - 8 students in Portsmouth if Elmhurst Elementary is closed, and although we have very positive feelings about our children's school, we strongly discourage open or implied negative statements or viewpoints about Melville and Hathaway, and we have responded to those comments with statements that we oppose the closing of ANY school right now. We cannot control what private citizens and taxpayers might say, but we can try to make the district better in the long run by encouraging elected officials to delay making decisions that limit our future options.
I appreciate John's analysis of the Hathaway scores, by the way, but here's the rub: all of our children will end up in the middle school together, and all of us will continue to care about their educational achievement and well being just as much as we do now.
We all need to understand that we function best as a district with a common mission: to provide the best education in the best possible conditions for all public school students. This cannot best be done if an educational asset is closed before the facility committee and the voters make their decision as to the long term fate of our school system, and the impact of such a decision would affect students in all schools. I hope this will be a call to action to advocates of education in Portsmouth. We need to strongly encourage our elected officials to work together to represent us and compromise with each other to attain the best outcome for our schools. I am encouraged by town council members Keith Hamilton and Jeff Plumb's attendance at the school committee meeting last night. I'd like to respond to Mr. Hamilton's comment that only one-third of the population has students in the public schools: there is no other area in a budget that provides more return on a community's investment than education does. We will insist that each group to put its best foot forward in budget negotiations, and we welcome participation from all schools.

Hi, Liz...
I think the parents of all our schools — and, indeed, all the people of Portsmouth — share the same goal: we want the best education and the best facilities for our kids while acknowledging the fiscal realities. This is going to take collaboration among all groups, and I think it's great that so many folks are involved and contributing to the process.

I want to be very clear that what Liz says about the vast majority of Elmhurst parents is absolutely true: they are focused on what's best for Portsmouth's students. I have talked with many of them, and every one has voiced concern about the comments of a few — about things like property values and test scores — being taken as representative. From what I have seen, that is truly not the case.

We are all going to need to work together to get the best resolution to this situation.

Cheers.
-j

I too would like to respond to Mr. Hamilton's comment that only one third of the population has students in the public schools. The statement implies that the schools only serve some, not all of Portsmouth's citizens. The statement implies Hamilton thinks those without kids in the schools don't want to pay for it.

Well, I have zero kids in the schools, so I'm one of the two thirds Hamilton is talking about. But I still think the schools serve me, personally, by giving society educated kids, so I want to help pay for them. It's the same logic I use when I think that I never once -- no not once -- have ever used the services of the fire department, but I still think it is my duty as a citizen to help pay for it. If the rescue wagon helps someone, it's me that pulled my weight by paying my taxes that helped save that person's life. When a Portsmouth High graduate goes on to be a productive member of society, it's all of us that pulled our weight by paying our taxes that helped make that person's life beneficial to us all.

We have to stop this insane "us versus them" mentality! It's our schools and our police and our fire and rescue and our beautiful town. We're all in this together.

I'm curious to know what facilities upgrades/patches would have to be done to keep the school open one more year. Would it be worth the cost (if any)?

Is this going to turn into the mainland schoolhouse that "should" stay open?...one more year...one more year...There are bathrooms in Elmhurst that have been closed since last year. A couple of weeks ago 2 of the classrooms had water on the floor...

Question - Are Councilor Plumb's comments a conflict of interest? He has 2 children at Elmhurst.

Hi, MomOf3...
I'm not a lawyer, but I would like to offer a perspective, given the material on conflicts of interest at the RI Ethics Commission Web site.

Comments at School Finance Committee meetings would seem to be exempt under the Public Forum exception and voting on the actual budget could be argued to fall under what's called the "class exception" which permits elected officials to vote on budgets which affect their relatives as long as they are members of a large class of persons.

There are probably one or two lawyers who peek in here, and if I'm way off base, I suspect we'll hear it.

But your larger question about facilities costs is a good one; there is clearly cost — according to a spreadsheet distributed at the Finance Committee meeting, about $45K in major maintenance and service for mechanical and heating equipment plus $9,600 for maintenance supplies. And that does not include any of the "Priority 1" repairs identified by the RGB report.

Cheers.
-j

Disclaimer: I am an appointed member of the Facilities committee.