Theater of Cruelty

In a ritual as sere and overdetermined as Noh drama, the Portsmouth School Committee this evening underwent their yearly "predeprivation proceeding," or in common parlance, sent pink slips to 32 teachers.

Feb 8 School Committee
L-R Chair Sylvia Wedge, Terri Cortvriend, Attorney Richard Updegrove, Jamie Heaney, Superintendent Sue Lulsi, Asst. Sup. Colleen Jermain.

First, Superintendent Lusi explained the context for the proceeding. "This is a recommendation regarding reduction in force. We do not submit our budget until March 25, it isn't voted on until June. We end up laying off some teachers that we end up calling back, simply because of the uncertainty, and because we can't lay off after March 1." Then, she delivered the bottom line: "The total number is 32."

School Department Attorney Richard Updegrove joined the committee and read through the legal preamble. "Tonight's meeting is a predeprivation proceeding. The action does not actually occur until the end of the school year. No questions are permitted. Members of the public may make a brief statement. Pursuant to RI Law, we will not report the names of teachers. Please do not make any comments about individual employees."

Then, in solemn sequence, the committee heard, moved, and voted approval to lay off teachers in several categories: 6 long-term subs. 5 one-year positions. 2 positions with less than 135 days, hence no seniority or right of recall. 7 regular full-time teachers "due to declining enrollment and the uncertainty of state and local funds, and to operate within the total budget for school operations." 10 displacements. 2 one-year positions who will be displaced and subject to involuntary transfer.

With the repetitive legal recitation accompanying each announcement, the mind begins to reel. It all becomes absurd and bewildering. This immense formality, carried out by participants for whom this is clearly not the desired outcome, but whose hands are tied by the law. We have hundreds of billions of dollars to go fight a mindless war, but not enough to pay these people who have been teaching, coaching, encouraging, and developing our children. A formal vote, and someone's teacher — maybe your child's teacher — is going to be sitting at home staring at a pink slip.

There's a moment at the end of one of the finest Western dramas, A Man for All Seasons, where the Common Man slips back into the darkened stage after Thomas More is beheaded. "I'm breathing," he says to the audience, "Are you breathing too?" Meaning that we have survived the tragedy we just witnessed. We're alive. But that sure as hell doesn't make us sanguine about it. Nor should it ever.

Finance subcommittee chair Dick Carpender said as much of what I was thinking as was probably legally permissible. "Every year we do this, we all go through the angst [of layoffs], given the economic climate that we reside in. I hope that these individuals will have their positions reinstated if funds are available."

Portsmouth NEA leader Carol Feather rose to respond. "I want to thank the Superintendent and the committee for your remarks regarding layoffs. We appreciate it."

I too hope that the layoffs turn out to be the ritual variety, but with the state's finances, and the crushing insanity of S3050, who knows where we'll be in June. It was a depressing little performance. Not as grim as Sweeny Todd, perhaps. Less blood, anyway. Sigh.

In other news this evening, Portsmouth High School principal Robert Littlefield has been named the RI High School Principal of the Year. I'm sure more detail to follow, and a much cheerier post.

There was a report by Finance Director Chris Tague which shows that the schools may be looking at a revenue shortfall of up to $240K due to state aid and Little Compton tuition numbers both coming in low. For this reason, said Dr. Lusi, she had drafted a letter to Town Administrator Bob Driscoll, responding to the request to transfer some money from the health insurance and 2006-2007 balances over to the Town. "We are sympathetic to the town's needs," said Lusi, "However, because of the revenue shortfalls, we don't feel it prudent to turn the funds back to the town when we may need to use them to balance our budget this year." Expect this to come up at the combined budget meeting tomorrow night. (6:30 at Town Hall)

The long-discussed changes to the building use fees were approved. Lusi made a point of thanking the members of the community who had worked with the policy subcommittee to get to an acceptable resolution.

And a new Facilities committee, led by Michael Buddemeyer, was formed to look at the school facilities and identify needs, develop upgrade plans, and think ways of supporting ongoing maintenance. The school committee approved the charter for the group, as well as the 3 members of the public who will be working with Buddemeyer: Sonny Grande, Steven Forand, and me.

Two notes are in order here. First, I want to compliment committee member Jamie Heaney. He not only voted to put me on the committee, he made a point of thanking me for attending one of the facilities tours. He was far more gentlemanly than I had any right to expect, given some of the tough things I've said about him, and he deserves a word of thanks. Jamie, you're a mensch.

Second, I'm in the awkward position of reporting about myself. So don't expect to see me blog about the facility committee's work, until we work out appropriate ground rules and expectations. This constitutes public service, minor as it is, and I'll be wearing a different hat.

Or perhaps, to bring us back to our theatrical metaphor, a different mask.

Comments

One of my pet peeves is when people whine and complain about the state of affairs but don't offer any suggestions and don't offer to help. Especially at the local level where volunteering and getting involved is pretty simple.

Sure, it's real easy to sit by and complain that the tires are flat. It's another thing altogether to be willing to roll up your sleeves and change the tires. Good for you!

Be prepared for people to complain about your efforts, though. You may be in there changing the tires, but there are folks who will complain about the process you've chosen for tire changing, or that we need to restructure the tires, or that maybe flat tires are just fine as they are. Heck, I had flat tires when I was growing up.

Good luck.

Hi, Portsmouth Citizen...
Well said. Fully expecting all that. But hey, I've heard worse. :)

Cheers.
-j

Instead of naming complaining, "complaining" perhaps we could call it "constructive criticism". If nothing else, we need to let people vent and embrace it as part of our 1st Amendment Rights

I am grateful to have the opportunity to engage in this process of "open kimono" communication while also listening to opposing views. Too many people only want to listen to that which affirms their belief.

While I am not impacted by subject topic directly, I feel I am a responsible neighbor and as an Aquidneck Islander, I have a moral obligation to participate in free expression; not to, surrendering to apathy; that is how democracy ends. We all keep hearing about "Change". Yes, we had change already back at the 2000 election about 180 degrees, which assured we would have a divided nation.

Here in short order are my concerns embedded in the human "inability" to accept change. Yes, the status quo is comforting and it has served the plutocracy well, but at what price to future generations?
We are living on a diseased and damaged planet with the oceans suffering most from man's massive onslaught on flora, fauna, and natural resources.
It is all around us. Even now, we have migrated to weariness over the safety of foods, toys, medications, water, air, travel, the infrastructure, and, how to protect our children homegrown terror attacks at schools. What does that have to do with the subject project?

Well, more growth means more people, more crime, more pollution and traffic congestion, loss of open space, more revenue required to support class room space and teachers, additional costs for fire, police, public works, and exposure to the interminable presence of beeping machinery shrills.

Therefore, if this "greening" revolution is to work for our advantage and improve the quality of life by constructing "traditional" housing, then we have missed the excellent opportunity to lower our carbon footprint. But then, greed always trumps nature and rather seldom do "Tree Huggers" win only to find out that another wave of change agents has arrived to reverse decades of hard work by simply invoking executive mandates.

We need to insist on "green" zoning (Maine has initiated "forest zoning").
A change in zoning should include "green" construction codes (available now). In addition, while we are at this, develop a bidding process for large developers to purchase an acre of open space for every acre developed.

Nevertheless, until the environment is decoupled from economic models and "standing" trees become more valuable than harvested forests, environmentalists will always have an uphill battle, or, until, God forbid, “Mother Nature's" fury registers its displeasure with "Father Greed", and they call her "Katrina".

Good Luck and always think Green,
Werner

Hi, Wernerlll...
I think green zoning sounds like a fabulous idea, and you should call Bob Gilstein and see if it's on his radar. Even in New York City, large office building developers have to contend with setbacks that decrease with height and allocations of ground floor space for public commons. Trading off to get green construction sounds tailor-made for the PUD process.

One thing I do want to amplify. I don't beleive that it's so much that we need to decouple environment and economic models so much as capture accurately the true long-term cost of bad environmental decisions and factor those in the the NPV calculation. If losing an acre of ground cover really means X tons of carbon in the atmosphere per year, then we ought to be reflecting that. If we did, everyone would be shopping local because strawberries from Brazil would cost $500.

Yes, I know we can't get there in one go. But this is a critical discussion to be having, and ecology and economy after all, are derived from the same word, oikos, meaning household.

Best,
-j