Kennedy on health care reform passage

Rep. Patrick Kennedy issued a statement this evening on the occasion of the historic passage (220-215) of health care reform in the US House of Representatives. And he began, appropriately enough, with a quote from his father. If you stayed up tonight watching CSPAN, I was there with you, and I know you'll enjoy it in full.

"And so because of your vision and resolve, I came to believe that soon, very soon, affordable health coverage will be available to all, in an America where the state of a family’s health will never again depend on the amount of a family’s wealth. And while I will not see the victory, I was able to look forward and know that we will – yes, we will – fulfill the promise of health care in America as a right and not a privilege."
-Edward M. Kennedy

Today is truly a historic day for all Americans, and as an elected official of this great democracy, it is an extremely proud day for me. It is an occasion to celebrate and thank all those who fought to protect our nation’s democratic process. It is also an occasion to recognize and remember all those Americans who have suffered waiting for this day to arrive. We have worked together to achieve this goal of quality, affordable health care for all Americans. To all these people, I express my sincere gratitude, and I rejoice with you today that a new chapter in our history has begun.

The Affordable Health Care for America Act creates basic protections for all Americans seeking access to healthcare. No longer will insurers be able to drop you from your insurance when you get sick, nor can they deny you coverage for a pre-existing condition. A public option will offer a choice for consumers and provide real competition to keep private insurers honest. Affordability credits will help individuals and small businesses to purchase health insurance. Additionally, these reforms are fully paid for and will actually lower the deficit over the next 10 years.

I am proud that the final version of this legislation includes numerous provisions I have long advocated for and worked with my colleagues to achieve. While the initial draft of the Affordable Health Care for America Act gradually closed the donut hole for Medicare prescription drug coverage over 15 years, I am pleased to have worked with the Speaker to successfully reduce the timeline in which this critical reform will take place. The donut hole will now begin to close immediately and will close completely by 2019, providing much needed assistance and relief to seniors starting next year.

Likewise, I am also pleased that the Affordable Health Care for America Act eliminates lifetime caps, provisions of many health insurance plans that limit the total dollars in benefits that the insurance plan will pay out over the lifetime of an enrollee in the plan. I authored a letter, signed by 23 of my colleagues, urging this lifesaving provision to become effective immediately. I am pleased that the elimination of lifetime caps on insurance has been made effective in 2010, so that none of the 25,000 individuals who reach their lifetime caps each year will die waiting for the provisions to take place.

A key aspect of this legislation that is of particular importance to me is the extension of the mental health parity protections established into law last year by my legislation, the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. Not only are these protections extended to all plans in the Health Insurance Exchange, but mental health and substance use benefits are a part of the essential benefits package created by this legislation. For 67 percent of adults and 80 percent of children needing mental health care that do not receive it, this victory cannot be understated. I commend my colleagues and my fellow citizens for their leadership in recognizing that the health of the mind truly cannot be separated from the health of the body. Today marks a new day and a giant leap forward towards our transition from a "sick care" system to one which is preventive, collaborative, and patient-centered.

Along these lines, I have also worked closely with my colleagues to ensure that mental health and substance use screening tools, such as Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), were included in this legislation. Severe mental illnesses are estimated to cost the U.S. hundreds of billions annually in lost wages. Screening for mental health and substance use has proven to be a significant cost saver for our health care system. The Affordable Health Care for America Act establishes a program to provide grants to support these critical services.

I will continue to work with my colleagues to ensure that our health care professionals have the tools that are needed to recognize mental health and substance use in their patients. This means ensuring that mental health and substance use education be required of all health care professionals and integrated into the medical curricula, continuing medical education, and licensing examinations. It also includes addressing the drastic shortages of child and adolescent mental health professionals by providing loan forgiveness and making grants to professional schools to develop, expand, and improve training programs for professionals who serve children and adolescents. Language to this effect is included in some of the Senate healthcare reform legislation, and I will work with my colleagues to ensure that these critical provisions are retained.

Again, I commend my colleagues, the leadership, and my fellow Americans for their steadfast effort, diligence, and tremendous stewardship towards realizing the dream of quality, affordable health care for all Americans.
— Statement by Rep. Patrick Kennedy

Note: From a media release issued by Rep. Kennedy's office.

Comments

Yet again our elected officials have gone against the wishes of the public majority and passed a bill that they have not read or understand. Representative Kennedy has once again proven himself a lemming who blindly follows the direction of Speaker Pelosi. He has no free thought and has not and never will read this bill!! He and the rest of the 220 have just destroyed the best health care system in the world!!!! The bill also only covers 96% of Americans!! I guess the other 4% don't count!!!! Brace yourselves for MUCH higher taxes for everyone, not just the high wage earners!!!

~IO

Dear Interested observer: I really don't understand your remark. You say that elected official have gone against the wishes of the public, yet I understand that most polls show the public strongly favors a "pubilc option" or even a "one-payor system", and the current bill has been endorsed by the AARP and the AMA - neither of which can be considered to be radical or fringe groups representing few people. You also criticize the current proposal as only covering "96%" of Americans - which is actually a tremendous increase in the current level of coverage - and at the same time you criticize the costs - are you suggesting we spend more to cover 100%? In addition you caution us to brace ourselves for "much higher taxes for everyone, not just the high wage earner" yet there is no proposal to raise taxes on anyone earning or making a profit of less that $250,000.00 per year, and the Congressional Budget Office concluded that the current proposal would save money over the course of 4 years. This is why I don't understand what you are saying, or on what basis you are saying what you appear to me saying.
Respectfully tendered,
Viking.

Let's take a few of these.

1) The CBO estimated the cost to be $1 Trillion http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=alc.ViCBRg9g
2) The AMA has not supported and this bill and is in the process of taking a membership vote on renouncing it. http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/11/09/unhappy-docs-push-ama-to-drop-sup...
3) Currently, when you remove the people who don't want to be insured because they can pay as they go, illegal immigrants and the younger, and I submit a little misguided, that don't get insurance you are at about 96%.
4) Most don't approve: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/h...
5) Econ 101 - there is no such thing as a few lunch. The money needs to come from somewhere.

~IO

IO- You make some good, or at least interesting, points. May I ask you this? Are you just fine with our health care system just as it is? If not, any suggestions?

No, I am not fine with it. I believe we should have some reform but not by way of a government run system. The current bill does not address tort reform that can cut down on needless surgery and malpractice. We need to work with the companies to provide coverage for people with pre-existing conditions. I just find it unbelievable that they are passing bills that they don't read!! Over 2000 pages and it still does not fix the problems!!

CMS needs to work better at cutting out waste and fraud. I look at things in a simple way: We already have a few "public options" in the VA, Medicare and Medicaid. Why not just rework them to provide for people when they are uninsured do to unemployment and the like. The just passed bill that fines companies and individuals for not having insurance is a shame. Sorry Mom and Pop but if you don't provide insurance for the three workers in your bakery were are going to fine you is not the way!!!

~IO

As to tort reform, this accomplishes only two things...
1. It saves from 1/2 of a percent to 5%, depending on which study you believe. That is MUCH LESS than my health insurance premiums increase EVERY YEAR. Some solution, right?
2. It assures us that corporations will be LESS responsible...yes, if that is possible, they will be less responsible than they are now! A person having their life ruined because a drug company is seeking profits (Vioxx, etc.) would have a limited amount of money to sue for, while having an UNLIMITED amount of expenses.......

So, the suggestion is to throw our entire system of law under the bus to save health care? Perhaps folks want to throw the patent system out too - or the copyright system? All of those cost us money also......

The sad fact is that we pay twice as much as the rest of the world for health care that is worse in many cases. It is breaking the bank and the #1 driver of excess Federal debt. It is the #1 cause of personal bankruptcy.

But yet, some people like things just the way they are.......usually these are folks who either have government run health care themselves or are tied into the industry.

Craig, I realize that you lean as far left as they come but I think you must have miss read the post. I did not suggest we throw out the entire system of law. I do however believe we need to real in the frivolous lawsuits for events that happen beyond normal control. The number one driver of the federal debt is out of control spending not for health care but in general. And for the record I don't have government run health care or benefit from it. I would also suspect that you work for some company that is making some profits to be able to pay you just like health care companies do. For every example you can bring for a drug gone bad there are a dozen good ones. I suppose we should stop all the research these companies do with their profits.

~IO

Where to start with a reply? These poignant statements focus on salient points, but to me, it can all be easily resolved: It is “Political Will” in my lexicon. However, now that the country seems to have split in half, no matter what the topic, can only harm our national interest. We are no longer a democracy, but, sadly, a corpocracy, pretty much controlled by
an oligarchy of power and the money it takes to exercise that power.

When we ignore the cost of wars and the barbarism associated with combat we have to ask what kind of people we are and want to be. If one single person can stop the health care train that can save people’s lives while the same individual brings in the bacon for the war machinery, no questions asked, to eliminate people, yes living humans (and livestock), can that be balanced in the totality of our national security interest? Do we want our resources for training youngsters to kill people or apply the money to turn them into American-born engineers for our future competitiveness and economic well being? Train our engineers to evolve into stewards of our planet and take leadership in bringing nations into the fold of reasoned diplomacy instead of unilateral combativeness and preemptive wars?

President Reagan stated, “Greed is Good” and that the “Government was the Problem”. Aided by the business model espoused by Milton Friedman that the only responsibility of corporate CEOs was to make money for the stockholders, America fell in love and we defend that still today. We are so convinced of this “free market” business model to the point where we are about to repeat the errors of our ways and continue this bust and boom cycle even before we are out of the latest “deep recession”, and this time setting up our tax payer children and grandchildren to hold the bag so to say.

So unless we choose to stop the insanity of war and treat each other Like fellow human beings, we will continue the barbaric behavior that has been practiced since the beginning of time. At the turn of this century
we have the world in our hand. But the world’s empathy came, sadly, by way of an unfortunate event born out of failed diplomacy and breakdown in hierarchical communication.

Our insistence for world dominance cost us dearly and will no doubt continue to require us borrowing money to the point where the defense budget and interest on our national debt are the same. And when the next GOP president is elected, the people living in fear of “socialism” will most likely get their wish in finally “starving the beast”: Social Security and Medicare. Nation building is unaffordable, but US health care reform is affordable and can save 122 lives per day. Healthcare is $90 billion per year. Defense now is $650 billion per year when only ten years ago it was $284 billion or so.

Is there room for trade? I would think so.

Cheers,
Wernerlll

I am with the Kennedy position all the way, and religion should stay out of it. The parochial men of the cloth should tend to their fallen sheep listed below. I want to see women have the right for pre-natal care under the public option and not have that right torpedoed by some hypocritical Congressmen and Senators. However, if you are interested in peeking behind the curtain as to whom and what is taking place under the guise of God, and the work of the “Chosen” involving sex, politics, money, and power, you might be thoroughly surprised and disgusted.

Here are the names (and sources) of some of the public servants determined to kill health care unless they get their way, and that means no more abortion in our land, period: Nevada Republican Sen. John Ensign, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, Charles W. “Chip” Pickering Jr., Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn, and Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback. And for all the hot reading go to these websites:

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/jul/19/behind-closed-doors-c-street/
http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/07/18/c-street-sex-scandal/
Good Read
Wernerlll