Council tells community to work out skate park [update]

09jul27_tc_skate.jpg
Skate park supporters Beverly Kelly, Cheryl Augustine, and Lori Rinkel address Council.

In an occasionally heated meeting of the Portsmouth Town Council this evening, about 40 citizens supporting and opposing a 2,400 square foot skating area in the Island Park (IP) playground brought their perspectives to the Council.

Rhonda Riley and Brian Whittier spoke for the anti-skate-park group, and presented a list of issues of concern to them as abuttors and close neighbors. Acknowledging that there is a "makeshift" skate area in the basketball court, Whittier handed out photos to the Council purporting to show the increase of trash. He also raised concerns about parking, alleging that the people who would use the facility are not IP residents. He argued that there had been an increase in bad language and vandalism, and an "incident of a dummy left holding a beer can." Expressing doubts about the size, he said "$50K? Does this sound like a small park?" He went on to say "The majority of the surrounding community is in agreement with these concerns."

I rose to speak and told the council that, yes, on occasions where I visit with my 10-year-old, that I have heard language. Kids are teenagers. You're going to hear some language. But giving them a place to learn a skill, develop mastery and positive self worth, well, that to me outweighs the negative concerns. And I urged the Council not to take the petition from those opposed as monolithic sense of where IP stood, since they had not even come to my house.

Kathy St. Laurent, a member of the IP crime watch, had originally supported the proposal, she said, but "the findings have changed our minds." The IP playground she said was not an appropriate place for the park. "We would not want it to be outside our bedroom window."

Madeline Pencak, a member of the original IP playground committee, said that the group "had met 34 times and there was never any mention of a skateboard park." She said, "No one was ever informed. We were never approached. It only came to light recently."

Lori Rinkel spoke for the skate park, and reminded everyone that the initial petition had been circulated at the 2008 block party. And that in just the last few days, since a letter to the paper on Saturday, the group had come up with a counterpetition with 160 names. She minimized the risk of people traveling to IP to skate this park, which is explicitly designed for 8-16 year olds.

Beverly Kelly read a letter from two abutters who couldn't be there. One, from Robin Pacheco, acknowledges "there may be occasional noise, but the joy and community building far outweighs the negative," and goes on to say, "The kids have already turned part of the basketball court into skate park. The children are already using skateboards. It's already here folks, it's just not engineered safely."

Cheryl Augustine expressed the wish "that group opposing would have met with us." "I personally met with Rhoda Riley after her letter in newspaper," said Augustine, "but nobody else from group even called us." And Augustine did offer one correction on the timeline: "Planning for this playground started in 1996. This was not just made up yesterday; this [a skate park] has always been in the plan."

Cheryl went on: "I'm one of the original members who created this playground. It was years in the process. I didn't give up because I believed that kids needed a safe place to play. I believe we are advocates for the kids. We are willing to work with the opposing group, talk about fences, add shrubs to berm the noise."

The pro-skate group had brought a professional skater, Aquiel Brathwaite, who said, "There's a next generation of kids, if they can't skate, what are they going to turn to. This is not just building a skate park, this is an outlet for kids."

It is somewhere in this exchange where Councilor Karen Gleason asked Brathwaite to step outside to change his shirt. He defused the situation by turning it backward. I had been standing next to him, and couldn't see what she found offensive. I promise to capture the clip and post it since it seemed such a bizarre moment to me — a public official telling someone they may not speak to a government body because of the clothes they are wearing?

And Gleason took this as indicative of how people would dress at a skate park. "Are you going to show up wearing profanity shirts?" asked Gleason.

Brathwaite took the high road. "I flew back here 3,000 miles just to talk." He responded. She's talking about shirts, he stayed on message. This round goes to the skater.

Plumb, quite sensibly, tried to move the question, and the council all seemed quite willing to let the neighborhood talk through this rather than make a snap decision that at least half would be clearly unhappy with.

"I'd like to see people talk this out, get some of these questions answered and come back to the Council," said Plumb "Hopefully this can be handled neighbor to neighbor."

"People are asking council to choose up sides," said Seveney. "What I suggest is the neighborhood get together and act like a neighborhood."

"What bothers me is what I saw here this evening," said Dennis Canario. "Divisive groups. That's not what Portsmouth is about. We're one in a million. we have a great bunch of people in IP and I know we're going to work through this."

Council President Peter McIntyre asked the groups to convene a workshop with Town Administrator Bob Driscoll in the next few weeks and come back with a proposal in September. Gleason specifically asked Andrew Kelly, who made the mistake of sitting in the front row, if he would participate, to represent teen agers.

Then the Council took a 5 minute recess, since it was already coming up on 10pm. I had to get up for work tomorrow, so I left. If there were any more fireworks, please leave 'em in the comments.

Update: Correction to Aquiel Brathwaite's first name.

Comments

Mr. Brathwaite probably made the mistake of thinking "a tee shirt is just a tee shirt." In fact, though the drawing on the shirt was a bit abstract, it appeared to be a figure giving a middle finger salute; I had not even noticed untill Karen had her tirade. Sigh. Probably not the best choice of clothes for a town council meeting. Nonetheless, I am not certain that it is appropriate for the council to enforce a dress code. Even if we presume that it IS the council's place to do so, I AM certain that it is up to the President of the council to maintain decorum; Ms. Gleason should have directed her remarks to him. We should note that it was only minutes earlier that Ms. Gleason scolded a young man in a green shirt in the back of the room to "stop with the attitude." Huh? This young man was completely silent and not disturbing anyone except, apparently, Ms. Gleason. Her outburst was inappropriate and an offense to the decorum of the meeting. People are entitled to express "attitude."

Hi, Viking...
I was standing about 10 feet from him when I was waiting my turn at the podium, and I couldn't make out the graphic on the shirt. It clearly was not sufficiently obvious as to register at first glance. Therefore, I would argue, it was not disruptive, nor was it an example of "fighting words."

I'll capture and post the video, and let people decide
for themselves.

Cheers,
-j

Dennis Canario is a good man. He has faith that we in Portsmouth are are not "divisive groups." I hope he is right, but I fear he is not.

Are we really "one in a million?" I've heard many people say that they think things have gotten less divisive in Portsmouth since the tent meeting and resulting Caruolo suit. Are we really immune to the ever-increasing shoutmatch that passes for political discourse in this country? Maybe the divisiveness merely isn't so visible with those high profile events behind us.

I remember not too many weeks ago you reported about a woman at a council meeting who ranted and raved about how she's become a "junkie when it comes to television and what's going on in America", and she rambled quite angrily. Maybe this woman was a more extreme example, but lots of people watch TV and maybe Portsmouth like the rest of the nation is getting more divisive, not less.

Maybe we're all getting angry at -- whatever O'Reilly tells us to be angry at, or Olbermann or Dobbs or Matthews or even the Daily News and ABC6. All that those "news" outlets really covet are their advertising revenues which are best preserved by ratcheting up the populace. We are bombarded on a daily basis with the message that we should be angry at the other people who do not think like us people.

So maybe the Island Park folks will work this out. My comment has little to do with that. I just look at Dennis Canario's heart-felt statement and wonder if it is more nostalgic than accurate.

Surely Mr. Canario has made a statement about what we should be, but I really wonder if that's what we are.

I consider Island Park to be a hidden gem of Rhode Island, and one of the best and safest places to raise your children. In essence a community where we look out for each other and our children. A place where a kid can be a kid. We have so much to offer our children, to many to mention but here's a few, the cove, the beach, the playground, planned activities and most importantly safe streets that our children can walk, ride bikes and play on. A skate park would only enhance the experience of growing up in Island Park. I know that there are some who oppose the park but their opposition, in my opinion, is not well founded. Trash, language, noise all can be a problem but problems that are easily addressed and solved. Parents will step up and let their children know that this behavior will not be tolerated at the park just as it is not tolerated in the home. A skate park can be an asset to both young and old - enjoy watching the children learn new skills, improve their talents, and remember fondly the carefree time of just being a kid. Who knows we my have another Joel Brathwaite just waiting to be discovered. Wouldn't that be grand?