Town Council hears 2008 School Budget presentation

Lusi presents budget
Superintendent Susan Lusi presents proposed budget with School Committee Finance chair Dick Carpender. Behind, Deputy Town Clerk Joanne Mower, Councilors Peter McIntyre, Huck Little.

Less than a dozen residents were at Town Hall tonight to hear the schools present their 2008-09 budget to the Town Council, and the questioning was largely around state funding, rather than the budget itself. As you may have read here, the proposed budget of $32, 611,083 comes in under the S3050 cap, with an actual increase of $1.6M, or a 3.47%. But some of the cuts to get there are deep, and councilors on both sides of the aisle (and Tailgunner Gleason, whatever the hell side she's ostensibly on) wondered if even more needed to be slashed.

With the budget anticipating level funding from the state, half-a-year's revenue from the wind turbine, and nothing allocated for Prudence Island, Councilor Jim Seveney expressed concerns that most of the Council seemed to share. "We're up in the area of $200K of financial risk," he observed. "I would ask that you think through some contingencies. In that list of numbers, something isn't going to go your way."

Unfortunately, there wasn't much left to cut. Even PCC, Inc. President Larry Fitzmorris, while praising the School Committee for containing costs by staff reduction noted, "Someday, we're going to run out of positions to reduce."

And there clearly isn't fat left elsewhere in this budget. PHS Principal Robert Littlefield, who addressed the Council (as did all the school principals) in a video produced by the high school students, noted that instructional supplies and texts were not even level funded in inflation-adjusted dollars, but were actually down by 4%, compared to 2001 levels. And what the Berkshire Associates report concluded was that to reach nationally accepted standards for library and instructional materials, it would take an additional $221K.

And yet, despite freezing teacher steps this year and capping Step 10s to a 3.1% increase (below the cost of living), and despite the fact that fully 18% of the entire allowable S3050 increase was eaten up by State-mandated contributions to pensions, despite all that, someone from the audience got up to attack the amount of spending on teachers.

Resident Sue Wrobleski got up to the podium and said, "I have a big problem with 80% of the budget being salary and benefits." Wrobleski questioned whether that money benefits the students since it "doesn't go to them at all." The Council, and the school administration tried to explain that education is a knowledge industry, and that textbooks don't teach children, teachers do. "The teacher is standing in front of the children," said Seveney. "It does go to the kids." And, noted Lusi, Portsmouth was in line with the national average for percentage of budget spent on salaries and benefits. (Not just benchmarked against our neighboring towns, Justin.)

Would I like to see our kids taught by the cheapest possible teachers? All Step 1, fresh out of grad school? With no help from more seasoned folks who've put in some years behind the desk? I have tremendous respect for teachers, and it is no slight to people just entering the profession to acknowledge that Portsmouth, with a good percentage of more senior professionals, is in a very strong position. Does that cost us more? Sure.

Would you want your brain surgery performed by a first-year resident? If you're going to court, do you want the junior associate or the partner at your table? In industries where intellectual capital is the competitive advantage — and education is clearly just such a place — you want experience, and those who appropriately value such skills are willing to pay for it. This stuff just makes me crazy. And you know what else does?

Larry Fitzmorris, in a very clever move, tried to get the Council to buy into the idea of reducing the school budget in anticipation of cuts to state aid. "We all know that the state is in trouble," he said. "The State is facing a $380M shortfall. That estimate is going to be changed in the next week or so. Many people believe that is going to get much worse. A 5% reduction in aid to education is going to mean somewhere in the vicinity of 280K, and it could get much worse. It is a serious risk in this budget estimate."

Now see what he'd trying to do here. The Schools have come in with a budget at cap; barring something really crazy, I can't imagine the Council not approving it. But if Larry could get them to reduce it based on fear, and then the State actually manages to pony up the full school aid number, the Council would be in the position of needing to revise the budget mid-year. Does that ring a bell for anyone? Yeah. Remember when Larry told the Council they couldn't do that? Nice try, Larry.

The meeting wrapped up about 9 pm. And I just have to report on something that happened right afterward. I'm a big believer that once is circumstance (scroll to the bottom), twice is coincidence (scroll to the bottom), but three times is enemy action. (Here you are, at the bottom.)

08Apr29 Town Council meeting
PCC, Inc. President Larry Fitzmorris and Town Councilor Karen Gleason talking after the school budget meeting.

That will make a nice montage, come election season.

Comments

So you are saying that because a town counsel person is seen out in the open,publicly, after a town hall meeting, talking to a Portsmouth resident, who happens to be PCC is "enemy action"?How do you come to that conclusion? As an elected official of this town she is required,and expected, if nothing else to talk to and answer questions to any resident who approaches her, what would suggest, or have her do, run away?
Are you saying that Mrs. Gleason is guilty by association?...This coming from the same man who is voting for Obama? ha!
Myself and a few friends can give you two pictures,maybe three to every one of yours, with Canario, or Seveney, talking to Larry, or(including) other PCC members, not always inside, or outside the town hall either, in plain sight where anyone, and everyone can see them.
Would you like a challenge, and some real competition on that montage of yours?We will be waiting, Bring it on!
I've said it before and I will say it again...You have a fixation,and obsession with
Mrs. Gleason,and obviously trying to destroy her character,and reputation...It is too transparent to all who read this blog, it won't work...please get help.

Waiting on that montage.
p.s. We all saw you on the tape, while Mrs. Gleason was talking about the issue of the school nurse,verses librarian, you couldn't even contain yourself and whispered into Len Katzmans brothers ear...You are so obsessed that you cannot even wait until after the meeting to blog this stuff, BTW...get your big head out of the way its blocking the view of the councel.

Hi, Stormie...
I can always tell when I've gotten something right, because that's when you magically appear to complain.

I make no secret of the fact that I disagree with the PCC and the positions that they take. (So, by the way, did the majority of the voters of Portsmouth in the referendum last November.) To claim that Gleason is just talking with Fitszmorris as if he were an average citizen asking a question is disingenuous. Do you recall the Council meeting on January 28 when she called Fitzmorris up to the podium to ask his advice? I have that one on tape. You want me to bring it?

I have nothing against Ms. Gleason as a person; I have no obsession with her. But when I see elected officials acting in ways that their constituents might find questionable, I'm going to report that. If you and your "few friends" have examples of Dennis Canario doing anything suspect, you go right ahead and run them. I'm waiting.

Go ahead. Bring it.

Cheers.
-j

ps: You want to play the Obama card? Fine. Let's hear Ms. Gleason denounce the PCC.

the council meeting and how much of a big deal you made of it. I see no problem with a council member asking a town resident who spends many hours at meetings to stand up to the podium with their advice,or input,or ideas, on any issues,or topics, facing our town, We, including Mr. Fitszmorris, and PCC members are all tax payers,and I believe therefore entitled to our input,ideas, and questions. It is our right to do so,as taxpayers,and the people who elected them. And the councils obligation as elected officials to listen to them all. I don't believe that it is fair to single anyone out. I do not believe that any of her"constituents" found that questionable, nor do I believe that you have the right to speak for all of them.
"To claim that Gleason is just talking with Fitszmorris as if he were an average citizen asking a question is disingenuous." For you to claim that she was doing anything more than that is to assume she was doing something undercover,and dishonest, once again without any proof,or fact, is just BS, and reaching at anything you can find to trash her. Yet you continue to claim that you have "nothing against her as a person"? Sure you do, otherwise you wouldn't spend so much of your time, blogging about every word she says, putting up pictures,and even videos of her. While leaving everyone else on the council alone. As if by some magic your constant bash blogging, negativity,and dislike for her will somehow effect the voting in November, you really give yourself way too much credit.
I have also stated that I am not a member of the PCC, nor do I agree 100% with everything they have to say, however...this does not give me the right to say negative things about these citizens of the town who have the right to their own opinions,and thoughts, that also applies to anyone who wants to join them.
"If you and your "few friends" have examples of Dennis Canario doing anything suspect, you go right ahead and run them." I never said "anything suspect", what I have said is the opposite, pictures of them speaking to Larry,or any other PCC members, to me are just that....speaking with! You are the one who wants to make your montage of Mrs. Gleason seem "suspect", so my montage was to show that many times they have spoken to others on the council,pictures have been taken, here ,there ...and nobody has ever been "suspect" of anything...until you decided Mrs. Gleason talking with Larry MUST be. This is all about you not wanting her re-elected,and giving it your best shot, it won't work, you see...you really are not all that important, or influential enough.
"ps: You want to play the Obama card? Fine. Let's hear Ms. Gleason denounce the PCC." ...Mrs.Gleason would have no reason to denounce the PCC(or anyone else in this town for that matter), they have not(tried to anyway), muddied, talked nasty,disrespected, taken pictures of her,or made videos...etc...etc...You are the only one in this town who feels the need to do so.
While I did make the comparison of ,I would hardly compare it to the importance of voting for the Presidency of the United States Of America...Guilty by association:OBAMA

Hi, Stormie...
Gleason talks with PCC president after meetings. Fact.
Gleason asked Fitzmorris to advise the Council on finance. Fact.

Your flailing retorts suggest I really have something here. Maybe this would make a good campaign spot...

Thanks!

Cheers.
-j

It will all just fall into place(perfectly) ...the more you talk the bigger fool you make of yourself... I love It! as far as "Maybe this would make a good campaign spot..." I would suggest a much smarter,much more experienced advisor.

Your very Welcome!

Hi, Stormie...
I'm glad that you love my posts. And I'm glad that I do have a smarter, experienced advisor guiding me: you.

When you're arguing at length and flinging mud and insulting me, well, that tells me everything I need to know.

Cheers.
-j

ps: Gleason conferred with PCC President Larry Fitzmorris after Council meetings here, here, and here. Have a nice day.

in comparison to the amount of mud flinging you have done at Mrs. Gleason.
I don't "magically appear" on your blog only to argue with you, It would be impossible to argue with anyone who is never wrong about anything. A real legend in your own mind, but that's fine.
Just as you feel the need to bash Karen Gleason, by telling untruths, and assuming things in your own mind about her,then blogging them in hopes that anyone out there will even listen to them, I feel the same need to speak up about how I feel about her. She does not need me to defend her against your unrealistic assumptions, your paranoia,and your irrational behavior towards her on your blog. But that's what blogging is all about, true? You have the right to say and do anything you want to, but using the same stuff,about the same person is really getting old, and frankly very weird,and creepy.
The way you get so defensive about the mention of her name speaks volumes to me. Its very simple...you don't have to vote for her, period.
Hmm... or could it be that you are like the boy who always picks on(bullies) a certain girl...because he really does(secretly) LIKE her? LOL

Have a nice day.
You can't appreciate a rainbow until you've felt the rain.

Hi, Stormie...
Point out one untruth I have blogged about Gleason.

I report on what public figures do in public meetings. If you find that "creepy," then maybe you'd be more comfortable not reading this blog. If you find holding public figures accountable for what they say and do "bullying," then I'd suggest some other place to spend your time.

What really is getting old is your insults and insinuations about my character, which you spew with the bravery of anonymity. At least I have the guts to sign my name to everything I say. And I stand behind it. I challenge you to cite one provable falsehood in my coverage of Ms. Gleason. I will be happy to retract anything shown to be incorrect.

Why don't we cut to the chase? Why don't you have your meltdown, get all remorseful, and storm off, promising never to return.

Cheers.
-j

Your untruths come from your lack of proof,and accusations against her, such as this last picture of her simply showing her speaking with Larry, and putting your spin to it, implying that its shady...etc...etc...you have a way of saying a lot without saying anything at all,and being very misleading, using this as only one example, so while you do not have the guts to say things directly, you skirt around with accusations,and underlying innuendo's, to make a point. So...why don't you cut to the chase and say it the way you really mean it instead?
"What really is getting old is your insults and insinuations about my character, which you spew with the bravery of anonymity." FYI...I have just spent 25 minutes trying to put my picture up on this account, with no luck at all, as far as my name to it...everyone who knows me knows who I am when I write in.
"Why don't you have your meltdown, get all remorseful, and storm off, promising never to return." It would take a hell of a lot more than a blog to melt me down. And yes I have promised in the past to never return...That would make you very happy, because you can sling the mud but you can't take it when its slung back at you. "I report on what public figures do in public meetings. If you find that "creepy," then maybe you'd be more comfortable not reading this blog. If you find holding public figures accountable for what they say and do "bullying," then I'd suggest some other place to spend your time."
Yes you do report what happens at the public meetings, but the ONLY Negative report,complete with pictures,and videos is of Council person Gleason. Isn't that very curious? That she is the only member that you can find any faults with?
You don't take even a little bit of criticism very well, but you are a master at doing so.
Okay, I will back off,since you are so sensitive...I've said my piece...and I'm happy with that.

Hi, Stormie...
I don't mind a reasonable amount of trouble. But in just a few replies, here's the insults you have thrown my way:

"You have a fixation,and obsession"
"get your big head out of the way"
"just BS"
"constant bash blogging, negativity"
"muddied, talked nasty,disrespected"
"the bigger fool you make of yourself"
"mud flinging"
"telling untruths"
"paranoia,and [...] irrational behavior"
"weird,and creepy"
"bullies"
"very misleading"
"you do not have the guts"

Who's guilty of rudeness here?

It is certainly not the case that I only find fault with Ms. Gleason's actions on the Council — I have very publicly and vocally disagreed with positions taken by Peter McIntyre and Huck Little. The reason Ms. Gleason appears more frequently is that she says or does things on the Council which highlight areas of concern for me, and I report them.

Like flip-flopping on school nurses. Last year, she wanted to slash $200K from the school budget by cutting a nurse, guidance counselor, and librarian. Now, she's opposing the plan (endorsed by Berkshire Advisors) to cut a school nurse. Such inconsistency raises legitimate concern that her constituents should be aware of. Do I repeat this? You bet. Because you're not hearing it in any other local media, are you?

Best.
-j

I burrow up out of my necessary anonymity again only to express my astonishment at how the printed word can provoke such passionate emotion. John - you somehow managed to push the right button yet again. Most bloggers can only dream of how to ignite such silly outrage with just a few words and pictures. Shame on you- with Stormie, its like shooting fish in a barrel. He/she is a blogger's treasure and you seem to have found exactly how to open the treasure chest.
I saltwater fly-fish off and on and what's going on here seems very much like that. You post for a week or two without getting a bite, and all of a sudden you put just the right fly out there at just the right tide, and strip it in just the right way and Boom!, the surface of the water just explodes! Amazing.
bb

Buckaroo,you need a bigger lure.Would you use a fly to catch a Shark? lol...Ya know...this is the Internet, I could be whom ever I choose to be, It is as simple as signing on here under a different name(duh),and password, and saying whatever I want to say without being "Stormie"to take the heat for it...So how about a little credit for that?
"Most bloggers can only dream of how to ignite such silly outrage with just a few words and pictures. Shame on you- with Stormie, its like shooting fish in a barrel. He/she is a blogger's treasure and you seem to have found exactly how to open the treasure chest." ....Yes...I get it ...Stormie writes in and stirs the pot(of small fish), I was waiting to see next how long it would take before one of his 4-5 groupies(or should I say guppies?) such as yourself buckaroo would comment on what a shameful,stupid,person I'am...I mean how dare I challenge,insult,or criticize, the almighty blogger in any way,shape,or form! Yet bringing just enough to get the little fishes(such as yourself) jumping out of the water, just where John wants them. I'm not stupid buckaroo...I know how this game is played.
Why do you suppose I keep coming back under the same name "Stormie"?and for all anyone knows I could actually be one in the same, and more than half of his replies.
Enjoy the fly fishing...but beware of the shark.
p.s. I'm female btw...Thank you for calling me a "treasure", but you are not the first.

Hi...
It's time for me to come clean. Stormie does not really exist. Stormie is a fake username that I made up to serve as a foil. No matter what Stormie says from now on, please remember, it's just a perverse fiction.

You want to play a game with usernames Stormie? Set and match.

Best Regards.
-j

Oooh how you wish that you were smart enough to fake a name such as Stormie to"serve as a foil".
John says:"No matter what Stormie says from now on, please remember, it's just a perverse fiction."...Sounds like you wish I were, which tells me that you are intimidated,and your huge ego has been threatened, isn't that why you want me gone,and to pretend that I don't really exist?
Perhaps that explains why YOU are the only real,true, FICTION WRITER, how did your FICTION book do by the way, sell many copies? I've always meant to ask you about that. You obviously are an excellent FICTION WRITER from what I've read in your blog. Do you live in a fiction world too?
If I (or anyone else) did want to play usernames...You would certainly lose that game. You have NO real way of knowing. And that is a fact,not fiction.
Hmm...maybe its time for Stormie to take an early retirement.
I'm feeling VERY creative all of a sudden...how about a game of...Gee...Hmmm...is it her or isn't it???Now wouldn't that be fun for you? ,Always wondering,Never really certain,Doubting people, in pure paranoia (blog) hell...Then again...that wouldn't be much of a stretch from the way you already are.

Hillary for President! and Mrs. Gleason gets re-elected to town council!
You have so much to look forward to.

Stormie...(check out my user account)
History
Member for
1 year 5 weeks ...and John is still fixated on Karen Gleason...case closed.

Hi, FICTION BLOGGER...
How do you like having no idea if this is really ME or NOT? Youre paranoia must be kicking in now,isn't it? Ive been a member for a year and 32weeks. Too bad none of you're friends have been on your silly blog for that long. I've just been waiting. Or have I?

Smarmie (check out my user account)

how stupid do you think I am to fall for that. Youre trying to confuse everyone. I'm the real me, not that fake name. I created this username 1year 32 weeks ago in case he tried to shut me up but he can't. Don't believe that.

Im for real.

Swarmie. (Check out my profile)

Hi...
Relax, you're ALL fake.

Remember, I'm not just J. Random Blogger; I do this for a living, and I have database admin privileges. I could pwn any account if I wanted to, except I'm not a black hat.

But do not tell me what is or is not possible. Please review the documentation for the False Account module at Drupal.org. Yeah. I'm running that.

Cheers.
-j

btw: Karen Gleason conferred with PCC President Larry Fitzmorris after Council meetings here, here, and here. And she flip-flopped on school nurses. Last year, she wanted to slash $200K from the school budget by cutting a nurse, guidance counselor, and librarian. Now, she's opposing the plan (endorsed by Berkshire Advisors) to cut a school nurse. Case closed.

So what if she "conferred" with Larry? It takes all 7 council members to come to agreement, and vote on anything. They are all just one vote individially, no one is threatened by this, or thinks it is news worthy, except you, the lone blogger,who obviously has a motive. All politicians flip flop(change their minds) occasionally, sometimes over time, there is NO law against that.
Speaking of people flip flopping, lets talk about how you bigtime flip flopped about Patrick Kennedy, who you not so long ago didn't have a kind word to say about him, disagreed with him,and called him nasty names...Now you are kissing his butt,praising him left and right on here, and having pictures taken with him at local functions. Talk about a flip flopper!
"Remember, I'm not just J. Random Blogger; I do this for a living, and I have database admin privileges. I could pwn any account if I wanted to, except I'm not a black hat." Go right ahead...accounts are very easy to cancel,and start a new one...you may end up pwn(ing) all day long.
As I've said before...We all make up our own minds come November election, don't like someone?...don't vote for them, its that simple. But you have taken it upon yourself to try and smear Karen at every turn, this is not just simply pointing out a flip flop, or that you don't agree with her , as you have said about two others you mentioned to me...I don't see pictures and negative videos of the other two people you have mentioned, Peter,and Huck...why?My guess is that they are men, you are only tough,and mouthy, with a woman. You would never sling mud,and negative pictures/video's at Huck,or Peter...YOU know better! And as far as Larry goes...he doesn't care,he's not effected by this in any way,and wouldn't give you the time of day,And finds this stuff you do "laughable"... Never mind allow you membership into the PCC, that you boohoo about. Do I smell sour grapes?
Does anyone really care that you and Katzman are buddies,and that Katzman reads,and sometimes comments on your blog? does it mean that Katzman shares ALL of your views, NO.
You keep reminding that Larry and the PCC are the minority in this town...so what are you worried about then? And you actually expect readers to believe that Karen is the ONLY person on the council who has ever "conffered" with him,before a meeting,after a meeting,inside the town hall,or outside the town hall. Talk about FICTION...stop living in a fantasy world.
"Remember, I'm not just J. Random Blogger; I do this for a living, and I have database admin privileges."...Before you go there,You know nothing about what I (or anyone else)do for a living...and let me end this by saying...We are all shaking in our boots! LOL.

Hi, Stormie..
You are the one who threatened to open multiple accounts. You are the one who claimed there was no way I could check that. If you're as smart as you claim, go read the documentation I pointed you to on Drupal.org. I did not start this line of argument.

You disprove your own assertion about me only being "tough and mouthy" with a woman when you mention Mr. Fitzmorris.

I have permitted you to post on my blog, I do not censor what you say, but you are a guest here, and I'm tired of your perpetual insults. I asked you way back upthread to provide one provably false statement I have made about Ms. Gleason, and you have not done so. I therefore conclude that you concede the point, and your only defense of Ms. Gleason is to attempt to discredit me as a reporter.

Best Regards.
-j

John - How do I respond to Stormie who reads my tongue-in-cheek sentence where I cast shame on you for so easily provoking "silly outrage" with so few words and interprets it as me calling her a "shameful, stupid person?" I'm at a loss. You're the pro here.
bb

John has blocked Stormie from replying, Notice her name is listed as whos online, but she cannot reply or log off(yet)...Also notice that she didn't "go there" until he called her a fake.
As a good friend of Stormie's I felt I should speak on her behalf,and let everyone know that John has banned her from replying.
Running away John? What a cowardly thing to do. Stormie has answered everyone of his questions in detailed explanations. All you have to do is read them all.
John - You can't handle the truth!

John has blocked Stormie from replying, Notice her name is listed as whos online, but she cannot reply or log off(yet)...Also notice that she didn't "go there" until he called her a fake.
As a good friend of Stormie's I felt I should speak on her behalf,and let everyone know that John has banned her from replying.
Running away John? What a cowardly thing to do. Stormie has answered everyone of his questions in detailed explanations. All you have to do is read them all. You call yourself a "reporter" , No good reporter would be so bias, they would always be fair in their reporting,and you have been very unfair to Ms. Gleason. Stormie is not the only one who feels this way, by a loooong shot!
John - You can't handle the truth!
Stormie has now been logged off...and I'm betting will never gain access to reply to this blog again, I guess I will be next. The secret to staying alive on this blog is to agree with everything John says,to say negative things about Ms. Gleason,to think of all PCC members as the "enemy",and most importantly, kiss the butts of( his buddy) Katman,and Seveney. Because after all those two want nothing more(top priority) than to give the school teachers more, and more money, what is it now 80-85% of the school budget goes into the teachers pockets? yet they cry poverty with no funds for text books, and the library shelfs look empty? etc...etc...after the teachers get paid there is nothing left!They are sucking the tax money(s) right out of this town, like leeches!
FACT, Not FICTION! They rationalize this by claiming that the teachers are top shelf, If these teachers were so worthy, then why wouldn't they care about the welfare,and the conditions of our schools,and our children. I've heard said that the teachers stand before our children and teach( more important than books), however the children come home after all these hours spent in school with 3 hours of homework to do each night!Relying very (too heavily in my opinion) on those text books.
John is VERY teacher bias...for the VERY obvious reason.

Hi, Delilah...
I have not blocked anyone. That is a demonstrably false assertion, and it is harmful to my reputation. I demand a retraction.

About the rest of your nasty attacks on me and the teachers of our town, I will only say that I do not believe you understand the nature of education. The teachers are what makes education happen, and that's why they account for 80% of the budget. Is it really your position that they were "worthy" they would work for nothing, eat rice and tea like Buddhist monks, and sleep on newspapers out behind the school? Would you work for nothing, Delilah? If your boss came to you and said, "You know, Delilah, if you really were worthy to work at this company, you'd take a pay cut. Because you know, Delilah, even though you help our company produce whatever it is that we produce, you are not really all that important and don't deserve to be paid. Be glad you have a job here, and take whatever we give you. You'd do that if you were worthy."

Would you work for a company like that? I didn't think so. Don't expect it of others.

Best Regards.
-j

ps: Don't claim that I blocked you to avoid your retraction. I didn't. I'm waiting.

and apologizing. Sorry about that John, it seems that Stormie was not blocked after all, she had a big problem with trying to reply though, it kept saying in red you are not allowed access(or something to that effect), yet her name would come up, did twice, on the who's online user list here. Stormie did tell me that she honestly didn't think she was blocked because you have never blocked her in the past, MY mistake and for that I do apologize. When I'm wrong I will admit to it. Sorry.
I stand by my opinion on the teachers. "Is it really your position that they were "worthy" they would work for nothing, eat rice and tea like Buddhist monks, and sleep on newspapers out behind the school? Would you work for nothing, Delilah?" Why must you be so extreme? Of course I would not expect that, nor would I expect anyone to work for nothing, what a crazy statement that is. There is a happy medium, and when the school department cries about not having money for text books,band uniforms etc etc etc.......and we are already being taxed to death, people are seriously already being taxed right out of the homes they have lived in ,some over 40 years, long after they have raised their own children in this town,and put them through the schools, they are still asked to pay more,and more ,and more. What do you think the taxes should go up to? People do not want,and cannot afford to pay another dime, something has to give somewhere. Seems to me the only people who are not suffering ,and do not have anything to complain about in this town,are the school teachers, because that's where 80% goes, So, Yes I believe the pay scale there is TOO high, and your answer to that is? "they would work for nothing, eat rice and tea like Buddhist monks, and sleep on newspapers out behind the school?" I hardly think that any sane human being could feel that way, so please don't get all extreme on me,or insult my intelligence that way.
Teachers are very rich in comparison to many of people I know in this town who also work extremely hard for thier money everyday of thier lives,to try to afford,a home,food,clothing,and an education for thier familys,and without what we all "produce" as tax payers, and familys there would be NO money at all for teachers,it is ONLY because of our hard earned money that they have a job, because of all of US!, not inspite of us.WE pay thier salary,and their bills.Just as we do police,and firemen, Do THEY make a teachers wage?NO, they only get to safe lives,protect us everyday,and run into burning buildings! I do not have a problem with putting my tax dollars there! You say" I will only say that I do not believe you understand the nature of education. The teachers are what makes education happen" I do not believe that you understand that it is the people who pay extremely HIGH taxes that make teachers able to work, teach,and live in this town in the first place, And my opinion is that the spending is out of control in that area, I will not take that back. Do you not agree that parenting,and being able to afford a family,home...etc...shouldn' be the number one priority here??? I believe that everyone, teachers, Everyone should be paid a fair amount, but 80% of the budget, NO!
I have talked to Stormie,and she just wants to say that she will not "magically appear" again, she has said what she felt she needed to say, she has come back a few times, only in defense of Karen Gleason, who I know she feels very strongly about being a good person and feels Karen is not getting any respect,and a bad rap on your blog.
Even a small pay cut for all teachers in Portsmouth,would still have them above average on the pay scale,and would help to use that money BACK into our schools to benefit the children(only). I'm NOT saying cut them, give it to me!
Please don't ask for another reply, It will be a very long time, if ever, that you see my username here again. I don't like the way you threatened to, or at the very least implied that you could, basically(what it boils down to) is HACK, ones computer. Because you have that power to through your database and job...Well We have everything you said printed out,and IF Stormie's, or my own PC goes haywire....we have that on paper.

~D

Hi, Stormie, Delilah...
I gave you the opportunity to come clean, and you did not take it. Stormie and Delilah are the same person, logging in from the same computer. I told you exactly what module I was running to track usernames, and gave you every opportunity to admit what you were doing. I will let the rest of my readers judge your behavior: logging in under a different name and making false allegations to defend your position.

And don't embarrass yourself threatening to go to the authorities if your computer crashes. The Internet is not some magic wand; I control only my web server, and that is obvious to anyone knowledgeable about IT. To construe my statement as a threat to hack your PC is a paranoid fabrication.

I take you at your word that you will not be appearing here again.

Best Regards.
-j

It's entirely possible that Stormie had the troubles she complained of. I too have experienced occasional problems logging on here, usually fixed by deleting my cookies.

It's also entirely possible that Stormie thought she was locked out and went to visit her friend Delilah who logged on AND so then could Stormie from her friends computer.

Heck, my mother in law uses my computer all the time when she's over my house, but that doesn't mean she and me are the same person.

John says he can tell from his server that Stormie & Delilah (forgetting for a moment that they may be the same person) are logging on from the same computer. There are eight Stormie posts in this thread before Delilah even comes on the scene. So either Stormie called her friend Delilah over to her house to log on with her computer (which she thought was blocked) so Delilah could make her last two posts with her own username, or Stormie was posting from her friend Delilah's computer all along. Neither scenario makes any sense whatsoever. This just gets weirder by the moment.
bb

Hi, Portsmouth Citizen, bb,
You are absolutely right — what I can prove is that Delilah logged on from Stormie's computer. So the scenario is possible where Stormie can't log in, gets angry, calls up Delilah, and Delilah comes over at 8:30 on a Saturday night to log in on her machine.

Do Stormie and her friend really care that much about this blog, notwithstanding their protestations to the contrary?

Or, given that that Stormie bragged:

If I (or anyone else) did want to play usernames...You would certainly lose that game. You have NO real way of knowing. And that is a fact,not fiction.
Hmm...maybe its time for Stormie to take an early retirement.

And, given that the last posts by Delilah are all made from the same machine.

Isn't the least hypothesis that she did what she claimed?

Best Regards.
-j