Skate supporters: CDBG hearing Monday night

On Monday evening, the Portsmouth Town Council will discuss this year's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) proposal, and one of the items listed is funding for improvements to the Island Park playground, including, according to a source familiar with the process, "playground improvements to include a skate area."

If you're a supporter of the skate area, please be there tomorrow to speak up for including this project in the grant request. If you can't be there in person, send a note to the council (e-mails below).

Opponents of the skate area have already been communicating with the Council, based on documents obtained by hard deadlines, and I would anticipate there will be a...uh...vigorous discussion.

Just to review a few facts: Funding for the skate area was included in last year's CDBG proposal, so this is nothing new. This is a competitive process, and the money comes from the Federal department of Housing and Urban development. While support would prioritize projects that impact housing (like Church Community Housing Corporation, who manage the senior housing facility, Anthony House, where the PCC have their meetings), improvements to a playground for a low-to-moderate income area such as Island Park are certainly within the scope of such grants.

Also, as a member of the ad-hoc committee which met last summer in a failed attempt to find an acceptable solution, I want to be very clear about what the committee decided. When we could not come to consensus on any of the solutions that were proposed — and supporters progressively backed down from the original design for an true skate park to a small asphalt surface with equipment that could be removed after a trial period — we agreed to table the question of the skate area. As an ad-hoc committee.

Let me say that again: As an ad-hoc committee, asked by the Council to meet, but with no official standing, we tabled consideration *by our committee* because we could not reach consensus.

This was not an official committee of the town, and it had no decision-making authority. There were no elected officials on the committee, and no open meetings requirements. This was not a decision-making body.

Any argument proceeding from the premise that the skate area is somehow "tabled" — which I have heard tossed around at subsequent meetings — misunderstands the role of advisory committees.

Can't be there? You can reach the Town Council at these e-mail addresses (hlittle@portsmouthri.com, dcanario@portsmouthri.com, kgleason@portsmouthri.com, khamilton@portsmouthri.com, jplumb@portsmouthri.com, jseveney@portsmouthri.com) and their phone numbers available on the Portsmouth Web site.

Previous coverage can be found here.

If you're on Facebook, check out the "Support the IP Skate Park" group.

Full disclosure: If it isn't completely clear from the above, I am a supporter of a skate area for our kids in Island Park, and was a member of the ad-hoc committee last summer.

Comments

John,

I still can't figure out why these people that are so against a Skate Park and are so against youth that they would have their makeshift skate park removed and are still opposing a semi-permanent one. It appears to me that these individuals have a lot of hate built up inside and it also appears to me that they are taking it out on the children of Island Park, How more evil can you get? They are literally a group of NIMBY's which is not good to have in any community because they instead of progress they would like it if we regress. I personally think that these opposers need to grow up and stop being against the youth because that is exactly what they are doing and that’s wrong.
To the people opposed if you read this: get over yourselves stop being against the youth of your neighborhood!

Portsmouth Pride

Hi, Portsmouth Pride...
I don't think we get anywhere in a discussion by demonizing those who disagree with us, so while I can understand your emotion, I don't feel we should be tossing around highly charged words. Folks who are opposed to the skate park are still our neighbors, and while we might disagree with them, I would urge that we continue to respect them and try to work through this in a civil fashion.

Also, from my understanding, the Town was required to remove the equipment based on our insurance policy. Even if there was no one opposed to the skate area, this would have happened eventually, so I don't think it's fair to blame this on anyone. And, speaking as a taxpayer, given such a a Town liability issue, there was no choice.

Where I do agree, very much, is that this is about saying "Not In My Backyard." And, more to the point, laboring under the misconception that someone's proximity to a public space gives them veto power over its use. The Island Park playground is clearly public property -- as evidenced by the removal of the equipment based on municipal insurance requirements. The Town Council has the authority to make decisions about what is placed on public property, and while they have a responsibility to "grant elector[s] an opportunity to be heard on a given question" they need to make decisions for the common good, not just the wishes of one faction or the other.

Best Regards.
-j